| MSN TV's profileMSN TV BlogPhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
|
August 24 Someone Wanted to Be a Millionaire Too Badly
I'm the sort of armchair game show fan who yells at contestants when they screw up and who feel in my heart of hearts that the money they lose was rightfully mine. So I feel compelled to talk about Ken Basin, who wrapped up the summer run of "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" by blowing the million-dollar question. Not that I could claim that I would have gotten it right. You can see the whole affair above. Was the answer Fresca, V8, Yoo-Hoo or A&W? I got the this one wrong. Hint: The correct drink is mentioned in Caddyshack. There's a thin line between deserving praise for cajones big enough to go for a million and deserving mockery for giving up a sure-thing $500,000. I'm sure the poor sap will be kicking himself for the rest of his life. Any "Millionaire" fans, by the way, hoping the show gets yet another revival with Reege? - posted by Raoul 'Savage Love' to Become a TV Series?One of my favorite columns is Dan Savage's "Savage Love," appearing in alternative weeklies nationwide.
Now it's come out that Savage is in the middle of making a pilot of a show for HBO.
Since the show's only scheduled to be taped this week and since there's all sorts of things that can happen between even a successful pilot and a series that airs, it may be premature to get one's hopes up.
But I think anything Savage would be involved in would likely be the right combination of funny, sexy and intelligent.
- posted by Raoul August 19 'Shaq Vs' Has Some Redeeming QualitiesI tuned into "Shaq Vs" with a lot of trepidation. I'm not a big fan of the Cleveland Cav's new big man.
I mean, I don't have anything in particular against him (other than having watched his "acting" turn in "Steel") but I don't have any particular love for him. Plus, the premise of the show (Shaq "competes" against other world-class athletes in their sport with a handicap) seemed like it was prime for 60 minutes of ego-stroking.
But I have to say I was pleasantly surprised with the first installment last night. There were enough fun moments that I would consider tuning into future episodes.
Last night had Shaq face off againt the Steelers' Ben Roethlisberger in a gridiron challenge. There was trash talk aplenty as the two competed in Horse (which Shaq lost on purpose to give Ben false confidence, or so he said), and then a 7-on-7 touch football match where each of the marquee players served as quarterback. Shaq had to drive his team 20 yards for a touchdown compared to 40 for Ben.
The actual competition wasn't all that exciting, particularly when neither of the men had to deal with a pass rush. If you give just about any NFL caliber quarterback unlimited time to have one of their five receivers get open, I'm thinking they can make a 40 yard drive happen. Shaq managed to throw two touchdown passes on his shorter field, but then threw an end-zone interception to miss his chance to beat Big Ben.
What made it worth watching were a lot of the lighter moments of the two stars joking around with each other. Little goofy things like Shaq pretending to plan on selling one of Ben's jerseys on eBay, or threatening to bust out a victory lap.
Given the right matchup, I might give it another looksee.
- posted by Raoul August 10 'Shark Tank' Should Sleep with the FishesLast night saw the premiere of ABC's "Shark Tank." It's a series that has potential entrepreneurs go in front of really successful entrepreneurs -- the titular sharks -- asking for them to invest. It's apparently based off a similar series from Japan called "Dragon's Den," which just goes to show that Japenese imports aren't necessarily high-quality. And it's from Mark Burnett, the creator of "The Apprentice" and "Survivor." Which is surprising, because one would think that he would know as well as anyone what makes a good reality show work and this doesn't really have much of it, at least judging from the first episode.
A good reality show should have a) interesting visuals, b) someone to root for, c) someone to root against d) multiple storylines and e) clear-cut winners and losers.
No matter how you try to gussy it up, "Shark Tank" has the five sharks sitting behind a desk and a presenter or presenters standing up before them with a few visuals. Pretty boring.
You might like some of the sharks, given that at least some of them have rags-to-riches backgrounds. You might get annoyed by some of the sharks. That goes double for Kevin, who seems to be the Simon Cowell-wannabe and says things he thinks of his money as soldiers and that people shouldn't cry or insult money. But you can't exactly root for the sharks.
The investors are too fleeting to get to know and root for. And you can't really root against them. Mostly, in the cases of ones with bad ideas, you can just feel sorry for them. I don't have an MBA and am no money expert, but I can tell you that a Bluetooth that is implanted in someone's head is a Very Bad Idea. So is a device designed for doctor's waiting rooms that would let patients use the Internet but require doctors to buy in for $9,000.
Even when a deal is struck, it's not really certain if the budding entrepreneur did the right thing. Was the guy who had built up his pie business smart to essentially hand a hunk of it over to two of the sharks in exchange for some cash? How about the nanny who came up with a medicine dispenser shaped like an elephant's head? Were the people who came up with the already-successful College Hunks Hauling Junk smart to decline an offer to get cash for their latest venture, College Foxes Packing Boxes, that would be leveraged against the Hunks portion of the business? Who can say?
Overall, the show seems to have all the entertainment value of a Monday meeting without donuts. I can't see why anyone would want to be a regular viewer, unless they were maybe a business student and wanted to get schooled in what to do and what to avoid while making pitches.
- posted by Raoul August 06 Ramsay on RamsayGordon Ramsay stopped by Ryan Seacrest's radio show (FOX reality stars, unite!) and chatted about a couple things.
He talked about the over-the-top confrontation with former Marine Joseph in the current edition of "Hell's Kitchen," where Joe threatened to get physical with Chef. I don't know about you, but I was half-betting that was scripted. Because Joseph just went ballistic when Ramsay was just asking him a simple question about who the men's team had nominated and why. And then Joseph had to act like he'd get a chance to punch Ramsay out. But apparently, Ramsay said that beer might have been involved. To paraphrase Homer Simpson, alcohol: the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
On another front, Ramsay talks about the program where viewers will be able to follow along with him and cook a three-course meal in 60 real-time minutes. Jack Bauer would be pleased. If and when he ever slows down to eat.
- posted by Raoul July 28 'More to Love' Could Use, Well, More to LoveTonight is the premiere of the new FOX series "More to Love," the plus-size dating show. Going into it, I didn't know what to expect. It could have been a bad train wreck or a good train wreck. It could have been a very mean-spirited series as implied by the working title "The Fatchelor." Or it could be a super-sappy "Big people are people too" kind of show.
The pilot suggests it's more towards the latter than the former.
It centers around Luke, who's 26 and 330 pounds. The girls are a range from a physical therapist to a teacher's assistant to a rocket scientist, and they all meet Luke wearing fairly low-cut evening gowns. In their confessions, quite a few talk about how they've never really dated because of their size. And you'd have to be more cynical than me to not have at least some sympathy with them. I mean, when model-looking girls go on "The Bachelor" or whatever, in the back of my mind I'm always wondering "Why are these people having trouble dating, and why would they go on a dating reality show, especially knowing their sucky track record for actually creating relationships that last."
At least with "More to Love," it's somewhat more understandable. It seems you have the usual assortment of sweeties, attention whores, backstabbers, gigglers, neurotics and unhinged people that you might have on just about any other dating show. All the gimmicks and the musical cues. Just in a bigger package.
I should mention that it's probably my dog's favorite show since FOX sent a teddy bear that my dog has had fun attacking.
I kind of wish the show had decided to follow more of its own format. Instead of roses, Luke gives out diamond rings to the girls he wants to keep around. Why not have all the girls stick around?
I don't think it's worth watching every week. But I definitely actually hope that Luke finds someone special. And more than that, I believe that he actually might find someone special, which is more than I can say for most of the shows in the genre.
- posted by Raoul July 14 'Pitchmen' to Continue Despite Death of Its StarI never watched "Pitchmen" and I try to fast-forward past commercials whenever I can. Still, I'd seen Billy Mays pushing OxiClean a number of times despite my best efforts. I can't say I had a huge reaction to his death.
But somehow I think it's short-sighted for Discovery Channel to try to tweak "Pitchmen" to continue without Mays. Particularly to do so this close to Mays's death.
I know hit shows don't come along every day. But we didn't see "Another Crocodile Hunter" shortly after Steve Irwin was killed, did we?
- posted by Raoul July 13 Looks Like We're Heading for Another All-Star 'Survivor'A meanie judge won't let Richard Hatch take part in an upcoming "Survivor" because of that little old misunderstanding on the first "Survivor" winner's taxes.
Which means you don't have to be Ms. Cleo to figure out that the edition in question will feature noteworthy players of yesteryear.
Which begs the question: which past "Survivors" would you like to see come back?
I just hope we don't have another Johnny Fairplay go-around.
- posted by Raoul June 23 'Superstars' Super BoringJust finished watching ABC's new "The Superstars." Somehow this new reality series manages to be really dull, despite dishing out all the cheesecake and beefcake anyone could want.
I spent most of the premiere trying to figure out why it was so bad. The best I could come up with is that it tries to treat itself as an uber-serious competition. Unlike, say, the late, lamented "American Gladiators" or "Wipeout," there's no joking around, no wink-wink, nudge-nudge acknowledgement of its own inherent ridiculousness.
My wife offered that it just was tooslow paced to be any good, and I think she may have something there.
About the only worthwhile moment in the whole show was when supermodel Joanna Krupa bitched at her partner Terrell Owens for his pathetic performance. You go, Joanna!
- posted by Raoul June 04 One 'Supermodel' Gets It AllFrom the beginning of the second season, two potential candidates stood out to me on Bravo's "Make Me a Supermodel." Jonathan and Sandhurst were typically at the top of the ranks and seemed to have that undefinable "it." The judges frequently said that Jonathan was money waiting to be printed and Sandhurst was consistently good.
So it was no surprise to see them get to the finale.
It was, however, shocking to see that the judges ultimately chose Branden. Because while Jonathan and Sandhurst were typically at the top, Branden was usually at the bottom. I didn't keep track, but I can't remember him ever being the top candidate and it seemed like he was in the bottom two a bunch.
So what did he do in the last week or two to win the title? Damned if I know, other than grow up from being a boy to being a man. Was it just that they wanted an American to win? Because that's about all I can think that Branden has over his competition.
- posted by Raoul June 03 My 'Celebrity Survivor' WishlistEven as we speak, "I'm a Celebrity....Get Me Out of Here" is sucking brain cells from Americans across this great land of ours. But the show would have been redundant if enough celebs would cowboy up and go on an edition of "Survivor." I'm sure Mark Burnett and Jeff Probst and a bunch of others would be down. And it seems like there are celebrity editions of just about every other reality show.
So the question is who would we like to see on "Celebrity Survivor" if there were one?
My wishlist includes:
Kathy Griffin: Because it's not a celebrity TV show without Kathy Griffin. And also because she would bring the funny.
Omarosa: Yeah, she might have been overexposed years ago. But I would still love to see if she could live up to her scheming, manipulative persona without being able to kiss up to the Donald.
Kiefer Sutherland: Because he plays a tough guy on TV. But can he prove that he's one in reality?
Jorge Garcia: On "Lost," he's funny guy Hurley. I'd be curious to see how much weight he'd lose if really stranded on an island.
William Shatner: Just because the Shat makes everything better, and there needs to be a sacrificial old guy to be voted off early. Or maybe he could surprise me.
Chris Pine: Because it would be fun for there to be interaction between old Kirk and nu-Kirk.
Tyra Banks: I'm sure that to see her in a medium where she's not queen of all she surveys would be worth tuning in all by its lonesome.
Eva Longoria: Ditto. Plus I'm superficial enough to admit wanting to see her in skimpy clothing.
Brett Farvre: Someone from the sports world should be part of the cast.
Jeff Probst: Yeah, it would be weird to have someone else emcee "Survivor," even for just a season. But I would love to see Jeff endure some of the same hell he's put people through.
Who would you like to see attempt to outwit, outplay and outlast?
- posted by Raoul
May 27 'Hitched' Should Be DitchedSo I watched the premiere of the CW's "Hitched or Ditched." It's a reality show in which long-term couples get a fake ultimatum: either get married in a week at a fantasy wedding we pay for or suffer televised humiliation of a breakup. There was a show that had a lighter-weight version where the couple just went on dates with new people and decided if they wanted to continue their relationship. For the life of me, I can't remember what that was.
In the inaugural episode, we meet Travis and CeLisa. She's apparently a bit of a handful, and he's a commitment-phobe. None of their relatives think they should be married. The night before the wedding, CeLisa and her bachelorettes got a couple guys to take off their shirts. Which triggered Travis into being unduly jealous. And so when it comes to the climactic moment, she's willing to get married. But he's not. Burn!
Actually, it wasn't all that exciting. Watching seemed to allow for two possibilities: the one that happened, or them going forward with a marriage that was doomed.
All in all, the show seemed strangely paced and had not enough to recommend it for ongoing viewing. There are only two reasons one could tune into the show: because you're into frou-frou wedding porn, or because you're secretly hoping for people to be left at the altar.
If you're into frou-frou wedding porn, there's a bunch of shows that do it better.
And if you're into people getting ditched, well, half the time you're going to be disappointed. As for the the other half, even schadenfreude can only take you so far.
- posted by Raoul May 18 'Survivor's' Winner Tells AllIt might have been the most bromantic "Survivor" finale ever. J.T. and Stephen had been working in concert early on, and clearly developed a friendship out in the Brazilian wilderness. But in the end, there can only be one. And all seven jury members selected J.T. to be that one. I talked with him this afternoon about his win, his relationship with Stephen and some of the highs and lows of the game.
MSN: Congratulations, J.T., on winning "Survivor!"
J.T.: Thank you very much.
MSN: How do you explain coming into the merge as 3-6 underdogs and winning the whole thing?
J.T.: It was a very unlikely adventure and I didn't expect it would go this easily. But we knew that we were going in with guns blazing. We knew we had some outs. Joe informed us that Erinn was on the outs, looking for a way out from his experience on Exile. Also, we knew the huge power struggle between Brendan and Coach, so we hit the ground running. Taj went one way, Stephen went one way and I went the other. I was the first one to come up with something legit, but we just really worked our butts off.
MSN: You ended up getting every single jury vote, only the second time that has happened in "Survivor." What do you attribute that to?
J.T.: It's really unbelievable. I had no idea I could ever do that. I really tried hard to build relationships with these people that they really believed in and were really legitimate. That really helped me in the long run. Stephen kind of hurt himself in the final tribal as well. It was really amazing.
MSN: What does it mean to you that you were unanimously voted the Sole Survivor? Is it any different than being, say, voted 4-3?
J.T.: It means a lot. It's hard to believe. These people were very angry at me at one time, when they were going home. Some of these people I was never really close with. Brendan, I never really got to know. But he said some really nice things about me that I didn't see till I watched the show. I was really surprised that everybody wanted me to win this game. I'm thankful. I feel really good about the relationships I built.
MSN: What was the hardest thing about "Survivor" for you?
J.T.: I think the hardest part was I built these relationships and I really tried to stick to them. Toward the end of the game, you have to go against your word somewhat. You really have to vote people out of the game that you don't want to. It really hurts their feelings and it's really tough to decide who you want to send home.
MSN: It seems to me that you didn't really tell full-on lies. You just hid the truth. Was I missing stuff? Did you lie to people's faces very much?
J.T.: No, I tried not to. And when I knew I couldn't tell people the full truth, I knew I had to give them all I had to. If I had to tell them stuff that wasn't true, I would. But I tried to save face as much as possible because I knew people don't want to be lied to.
MSN: So what's the deal with Coach?
J.T.: I love that guy. Coach is a really caring guy. His stories seem like they could be stretched a little bit. They even get bigger every time I hear him. He's completely harmless. I wanted him to stay in the game as long as possible. He was a really predictable guy. He played his game and he laid it all out on the table for you. If you wanted to win, he told you how you could take advantage of him. He gave you good opportunities. I'd like to keep Coach around, but Stephen and others wanted to get rid of him because they knew Coach liked me so much that he would take me to the final two. It was unbelievable. Coach was a really caring guy.
MSN: You decided to vote off Taj instead of Erinn. Why didn't you take Taj to the final three?
J.T.: I was afraid. I knew Taj had made a promise to take Stephen to the final two, and I was much more afraid that Taj would beat me than Erinn. She's a much more physical player and no one liked Erinn from Timbira. They loved Taj. They thought she was innocent while me and Stephen voted them out. I didn't want Taj pulling any quick ones on us.
MSN: One thing you did at the jury was you acted up a little bit when you got confirmation that Stephen might have taken Erinn to the final two if the choice had been in his hands. What gave you the idea to do that, and how effective do you think the tactic was?
J.T.: It was really effective. Taj had hinted to me that Stephen would take me out, that he told her he was taking her to the final two, he told Erinn he was taking her to the final two, so I was aware what was going on. We knew we were both out for a million bucks. We were going to get each other as far as possible and then do what we had to do to win. I had a strong bond with him. I felt like I could beat him in the final two anyway. I was willing to risk it because I really like Stephen that much. Plus it's so hard to turn on people you build this good relationship with. It's very interesting. I think the votes might have been 4-3 had Debbie not called Stephen out. Stephen's such a good guy that he told the truth to that question, and I acted like I never believed he would have done such a thing, with my head in my hands, you know. I really played it up. I think that was really significant in the number of votes I received.
MSN: Were you worried about that backfiring? Because I was like, he can't have been this taken aback by that?
J.T.: Not really. I wasn't really worried about it backfiring, because people still think it was legit. I think it was risky taking Stephen at all. I think Stephen hurt himself more than I hurt him in the final tribal council.
MSN: What do you think Stephen could have done differently in the final tribal council?
J.T.: Stephen, if he had done this, would have been throwing me under the bus big-time because it's not true. But if Stephen wanted to win a million bucks, he could have said, "Hey, this guy here has been doing this winning. I've been letting him win. I've been doing all the shot-calling. I've been doing the strategical play." He could have played on that, because that's what it looks like even though we made every strategical decision together and we thought out every decision together to make sure we thought every angle out. We've played this game together since day two and dominated this game together. But he could have come in and cut me out and really went after that million bucks. But just like I couldn't not bring him to the final two, he couldn't throw me under the bus.
MSN: You said at the reunion show you're going to be working with Stephen in some capacity. Do you know anything more about that?
J.T.: We're obviously a really good team. We work well together and have a good relationship. I definitely could see something coming in the future. But it's just talk right now, just ideas. Definitely as soon as we get something together, we will let people know because I feel we can be very successful in life together with the different aspects we bring to the table and bring to life.
MSN: You were also the winner of the Fan Favorite. How much does that mean to you? Is it just another $100,000 after the million? Is that a big factor, or how did you react to that?
J.T.: A hundred thousand dollars is huge factor for me. It was incredible. I never expected to win that prize. It was incredible. I'm very thankful the fans supported me. I'm speechless.
MSN: Any advice for any aspiring Survivors out there?
J.T.: Of course. I filled out one application in my life for "Survivor." If you really want something, you better do it. My mom made me fill the application out. I put my heart into everything I did out there. It's very possible to pursue what you want to do.
- posted by Raoul May 15 Congrats to the Latest 'Hell's Kitchen' WinnerLast week, Chef Ramsay promised that the "Hell's Kitchen" finale this year was the most competitive in the history of the series. And I don't think he was wrong. This was the first time that I could reasonably see either finalist having a legitimate shot at the title. In the end, Chef Ramsay chose Danny, the brash and young cook, over Paula, the more steady and consistent one.
Here's what Danny had to say for himself:
MSN: Danny, congratulations! You were pretty exuberant when you found out you were the winner of 'Hell's Kitchen."
Danny: Oh, thank you. I was extremely excited to get the news.
MSN: What do you think was the key to your victory?
Danny: The key to my victory was definitely keeping a level head in a high-pressure situation. I think that's one of the biggest things Ramsay looks for, the ability to just roll through any situation and be able to make logical decisions.
MSN: How much did it come down to the picking of brigades? I almost felt like Paula had an extra hill to climb when she had to pick Lacey. And Andrea didn't do so well either.
Danny: It was definitely a huge advantage for me to win the last challenge and get the first pick. Not only did I get my first choice, but I didn't get stuck with the last choice. It was definitely nice to pull that off. She definitely had a challenge with her brigade, as did I. Gio wasn't glad about being there. It was a challenge to get him to perform and to put out, but he ended up doing a really good job in the end.
MSN: Chef Ramsay credited you with developing through Hell's Kitchen's process the fastest. What do you think helped you mature so quickly?
Danny: This is everything I want to do with my life. This is my career. This is my love. So when I have an opportunity to learn anything from a chef with more experience, I'm more than willing to accept it. It was just a huge learning experience for me, and I was able to open up and soak up any kind of advice that Chef Ramsay or Chef Scott had to give to me.
MSN: Why did you get the nickname "the Velvet Hammer"?
Danny: My buddies back in the day nicknamed me the Velvet Hammer, because I was the smooth one out of my group of friends. I was the guy with all the gals.
MSN: What was the biggest challenge for you in Hell's Kitchen?
Danny: My biggest challenge was the pressure. I was able to handle it, but it was definitely very tough. It's hard enough just working in a busy restuarant, and then to have someone riding you, putting so much pressure on you every single moment that you're cooking makes it that much harder.
MSN: So how did you deal with the pressure?
Danny: Shoot man, I don't know. I guess I have a trait in my personality that I'm able to stay cool and calm. I'm able to let things just roll off my back.
MSN: How much of the Borgota did you see?
Danny: We didn't see much but an empty space. They're putting it up now, and we're shooting to open the third week in June.
MSN: How much is that restaurant going to be like your half of Hell's Kitchen was?
Danny: I don't have too much to say about that. I'll be working with Chef Steven Culp, who is a very well decorated chef here. He just moved back from Vegas and we'll be working together on that.
MSN: What was your low point in Hell's Kitchen and how did you get over it?
Danny: My low point was definitely the 100 Chef challenge for lunch. I completely misunderstood the whole concept of the challenge and completely bombed that one. Getting over that was just a matter of getting back into the kitchen and not dwelling on it and moving forward and thinking of the night's dinner service and the task at hand rather than what I screwed up that morning.
MSN: What was it like meeting the other "Hell's Kitchen" winners?
Danny: It was awesome. The other winners are like celebrities to me. It was very cool to be able to meet Rock and Heather and Christina and Mike. It was very cool. They had lots of advice. They've all been through it. It was very cool to have those guys in my corner.
MSN: What, if anything, do you think you would have done differently if you had it to do over again?
Danny: You know man, I don't know. I just went in there and I did what I do and I cooked from the heart and basically relied on my natural instincts in the kitchen. It seemed to work for me, so I don't know if I would change anything.
MSN: It seemed like you were one of the chefs who was the biggest at talking trash, but you managed to back it up. Is that a fair assessment?
Danny: Yeah, I'm definitely not shy about my skills. I'm definitely a little cocky. I've got a chip on my shoulder, but most chefs do. It's just a matter of whether you can back it up or not. You've got to be careful of what you say.
MSN: Danny, what would your idea of a perfect meal be?
Danny: A perfect last meal has got to be something that Mom cooked. Something that a mom would make, like chicken and dumplings.
- posted by Raoul May 12 'The Amazing Race' Winners Tell AllSunday marked the end of another edition of "The Amazing Race," and as I (and probably most fans) predicted, Stanford- and Harvard-educated siblings Victor and Tammy took home the $1 million dollar prize. (It just so happens I was at Stanford concurrently with Victor, but we didn't know each other). But I couldn't have expected that it came down to them being able to mount a come-from-behind victory. In the final Hawaii leg, the teams had to season and carry a 140-lb pig a distance, which gave Margie and Luke a huge lead. But Luke lost it when he was unable to figure out a Roadblock that involved placing surfboards with scenes from their travels in the correct order.
I chatted with Victor and Tammy (and for that matter, second-place finishers Cara and Jamie). Here's some of the highlights of what Victor and Tammy had to say:
MSN: What do you think was the biggest key to winning the Race?
Victor: Surviving Romania. And surviving my stubbornness and learning how to adjust our strategy a little bit. I think that was key.
MSN: About that Romania leg, it seemed like you guys were doomed. Victor: I thought we were doomed.
Tammy: Everything that could have gone wrong went wrong for us. First we thought we were sitting pretty on the first flight out that no one else could get, and then the plane had mechanical problems where the landing gear might not come down. ... And then what they didn't show on television was we were sitting in trams to take us from the airport and another tram ran into us. So we got into a car accident after our plane made an emergency landing. And when we got to Romania I had to don white spandex and show the world I can't cartwheel. And then of course we hiked for four hours out of the way up and down a mountain.
Victor: That was almost like a divine lesson we were forced to learn.
MSN: Tammy, I felt so bad for you. Why didn't you speak up and tell Victor what's what?
Tammy: I did speak up and tell Victor many times that I did think we weren't doing the right thing. But I never put my foot down and said I think we're doing the wrong thing, stopped, turned around and I'm not listening to you any more. At the end of the day I put a burden on Victor to listen to me, realize I was right and agree with me and turn around. There was something in me that I had a problem telling him what to do.
MSN: What did you learn from the Race?
Victor: One thing I learned was I can't think of how we were doing on the Race as my sole responsibility. I think I was putting a lot of pressure on myself to make sure we were always making the right decisions, to listen to Tammy but to be the ultimate decision-making. It really brought home that we need two people to win the Race. Secondly, I realized I can't just focus on the task and focus on the Race itself. It's really important that I focus on Tammy and she focus on me. I had to make sure I was focusing on her, or otherwise we weren't going to work well together. Strategywise, I always wanted to win it. I wanted to be number one every single moment and race ahead. In Romania, the flight attendants were only a minute behind us.
Tammy: On paper, we look so similar. We both went to Stanford. We both went to Harvard. We're both corporate litigators, but we're both very different. We went into the Race wanting different things. He wanted to push every advantage, every moment, and be first in every leg. I went into the Race thinking let's just not be last until the last leg. I really want to enjoy this. I want to make friends. As long as we're not last, we can have a good time and then we can push it. I think our different personalities caused a lot of friction, but we were able to figure it out in the end.
MSN: Let's talk about your decision to U-Turn the sisters. In retrospect, how do you feel about it?
Tammy: I stand by our decision. I was very hesitant to use the U-Turn at all going into the Race. But then Victor and I talked about it and decided if we're going to use it at all, we're not going to use it out of spite. We're not going to use it because we like some teams more than others. We're going to use it against a team we're scared of. And we were scared of Jen and Keisha. Not because we didn't think Margie and Luke were a strong team. Not because we didn't think Jamie and Cara were a strong team. But because Jen and Keisha have something Victor and I don't have. They have extreme athletic ability and we were scared if we were in another footrace with them, we'd lose.
Victor: We think Margie and Luke overall were a stronger team, but in terms of just matchups, we felt we could always match up against Margie and Luke but Jen and Keisha, depending on what happened, we couldn't. And I think the last leg showed we made the right decision. If they had done the pig task, they would have just blown through that.
Tammy: They probably would be here [doing these interviews] today. It's very tough, because I became friends with Jen and Keisha and I know that decision is going to weigh on us and weigh on them, but at the end of the day, I do stand by our decision.
Victor: And I do want to point out that I think they were extremely classy. From the moment we U-Turned them, we felt really bad on a personal level. And when Phil asked them on the mat, when they had been eliminated who they were rooting for and they said it was us, it made it harder for us to watch.
Tammy: And it shows they're true competitors.
MSN: One of the things from the final episode was that it seemed really hard for Tammy to lift the pig. Did you ever try to crouch down and lift it?
Tammy: Oh yeah. Everybody asks me that. We definitely tried that, because obviously that would be the easier way to do it. I crouched down, hoisted the bamboo over my shoulder and was too weak to stand up again. I'm just that unathletic. You put that much weight on me and my legs couldn't let me stand back up. So we just had to do it the harder way.
Victor: It was a very harder way. Tammy still has the blisters on her hands to show it. MSN: What was the most enjoyable thing besides of course finishing first?
Tammy: One thing that was incredibly thrilling for me and I know Victor has told people was thrilling for him was the bungee jump. It was just pure thrill factor watching it. I was so scared and so nervous that I think anybody watching the episode thought I was a repeating soundtrack: "Ohmygodohmygodohmygodohmygod!" That was just so insane.
Victor: It was definitely the bungee jump. I would also say in the second leg -- we won that leg -- Tammy made a decision to run down that mountain and it was thrilling for me was it was the first time I completely let go. Having her make the decision all by herself, she was a rock star.
MSN: Now on the second half of yesterday, you managed to catch up because Luke got stuck on the last two surfboards. How much trouble did you have with them, Victor?
Victor: It actually wasn't that difficult for me. It just took some time to search through 300 surfboards. We just had to create a pile before you could get to the right one. It could have been the pressure, or Luke not seeing an image a certain way, but he got stuck. For me, I was just so happy we had the chance to still be in the Race, and with the passage of each minute, I thought, "He's stuck. I can actually catch up and win this." My brain was very clear. It was fun.
MSN: How far in advance of the other teams did you arrive?
Victor: We got to the finish line and it was probably about another 30-45 minutes before Jamie and Cara crossed.
MSN: What are you going to do with your prize money?
Victor: Pay off some debts.
Tammy: Same here. I went to law school and got some student loans so most of the money will be going to pay off that debt.
MSN: What advice would you give to people thinking about going on "The Amazing Race"?
Tammy: Definitely apply.
Victor: I've been a fan of the show since season one and I've always thought about doing it. ... If you're actually lucky enough to get on the show, just prepare to do things you're really bad at. I think it's just getting comfortable with that.
MSN: I don't know if you guys have gone on any fan sites.
Victor: In some cases, "fan site" is a misnomer. (Laughs)
MSN: I wanted to give you a chance to address concerns raised on them. One is that "Oh, Tammy and Victor had an unfair advantage because two legs were in China and they spoke the language so it was a lot easier for them."
Victor: We didn't do that hot in China. No question, the waiter task was going to be easier for us. Though I will tell you in hindsight, all props to Keisha and Jen. They rocked that task. I think it only took them 10 or 15 minutes. They did it really, really well. The truth in the matter, in China if you look at it, there are certain tasks that certain people are good at and certain people are not. That was our task. The swimming task was definitely Margie and Luke's, and not Jen and Keisha's. The run to the finish line was definitely Keisha and Jen. They were going to win that over anybody. And the choreography task, no one was going to compete with Jamie and Cara who trained their entire lives. It's just a matter of taking advantage and using your skills.
Tammy: In some way, saying we had an unfair advantage in China because we speak the language is like saying Jen and Keisha had an unfair advantage on the cheese hill because they're so athletic. The Race really challenges you in so many ways that having a language advantage is great, but that's not the only thing you need to win.
MSN: What's next for you?
Victor: I'm going back to work. It's a little weird. But hopefully, I'll have the chance to do crazy things like this again.
Tammy: I'm also for the time being going back to work. Doing "The Amazing Race" really opened my eyes to see how many possibilities and opportunities there are in the world, and I'll see what's out there.
- posted by Raoul
May 08 Chef Ramsay Speaks OutSo we are squared away for the "Hell's Kitchen" finale next week. Paula vs. Danny. And who better to give his thoughts about the show and the two competitors than Gordon Ramsay? I participated in a conference call with him the other day, and here are the highlights. On Danny: Danny is a young, ambitious, very tenacious young guy. When you have an individual like that that is just keen to get it right, he learns by his mistakes. I think the bold, exciting move about Danny in terms of what he stands for is he didn’t hold back, he’s happy to make mistakes, but more importantly, the only way you progress in this industry is by making mistakes and learning. He doesn’t take it in a defensive manner. I had a bit of a tough time with him at the beginning, … and all of a sudden this guy focused. And when he focused he left everyone standing. So that level of vibrance with someone so young, it’s hard to become that disciplined in your 30s. If you start like that with your 20s and you have that kind of attitude with that pure focus, then the sky is the limit. So no, I am very impressed with Danny. He’s going to be traveling. He’s going to go off and seek a different style. Based in Florida, and of course having that kind of insight to what he’s been used to, and not having a lot of time in phenomenal kitchens, my advice to him last time was, “Get yourself in a really good kitchen. You’re an asset. You know, spend a couple of months with a talented chef, because you absorb quickly.” He’s a very quick learner, so he’s got it all to gain. On Paula: Paula is very strong-minded; she has a focus of a long-distance swimmer. You know, she’s durable; her mind is set, she is incredibly creative, and more importantly, she has this really nice, sort of charming influence about her, a very sort of demure sort of attractive personality, because it’s just so controlled. But yet when she’s in the kitchen and she is on fire, you know, she cooks brilliantly. Highly creative, and a woman that definitely knows what she wants, and not scared to be bold. On having the chefs design their own restaurants: Sadly they’re not at college long enough, or culinary school, to understand the importance of matching the food with the décor. The opportunity that Hell’s Kitchen gives them to design the dining room is to see what the potential is if they get it right in this industry. It’s breathtakingly spectacular. So to give them a chance to have a little glimmer of hope with that kind of I suppose development creativity, and more importantly, bringing the food and the dining room together is a very, very tough call. So for the first time in their careers they are given the opportunity to excel and I suppose let it go, you know, get out there and show me what you want to do in terms of designing a room. So it’s a rare, unique opportunity, and obviously it only happens for the last two, for obvious reasons. But more importantly, it gets their creativity flowing, and they start to understand that dining rooms are there to be enjoyed, relaxed, with no intimidation, and the décor is as important, but the food is what they come for. On smoking: My father died at the age of 53, about ten years ago, to smoking. And my grandfather died at 49. I’ve never smoked a cigarette in my entire life. So I find it really hard, and it’s a bitter pill for me to swallow, to sit and watch these guys smoke their lives away earlier than anticipated. I can’t understand how you can taste food, reflect it, smoke, go back and taste it. There has to be an inaccuracy beyond belief. So I’m not their dad; I’m not there to mother them. But more importantly, I wish the hell they could understand the damage in terms of a refined palate is a trained palate. Smoking at the same time, it’s hard. But you’ve hit the nail on the head; it’s the one thing that I find it hard to tolerate. And it frustrates me. And secondly, you know, when you train a palate, it’s like an athlete. You know, every part of your body is toned. When you bring dishes and an ingredient together and it’s missing something, it’s too complicated, it’s only a palate that takes it there. So if I could ban smoking for every chef in the world as a mission, I’d start tonight. On whether "Hell's Kitchen" gets old: Do you know what? I mean I don’t want to sound facetious or incredibly arrogant, but we have an amazing team, and we – my kitchens are amazing places to work in. I love that challenge, to be honest. Having that noose around my neck and being in situations to get these guys up to speed, admittedly, you know, there’s 30 percent that are never going to make it, but I don’t participate in any of the casting; that’s not how I perceive "Hell’s Kitchen" to be, in terms of I don’t want preconceived ideas about them before they walk in; I take everyone at face value. So when there’s a natural opportunity there that shines and they’ve never had that opportunity in their life, that’s where it becomes sort of, you know, really, fundamentally crucial to continue doing what we’re doing. Am I tired of it? I am tired of the opening night service. So that’s becoming a bit of a ball break, to be honest. I try so hard. I simplify things; I try so hard and it’s – yeah, it ages me. I don’t know when I’ll grow into my face, but I just got back from India, and in three different states across India, every person I dealt with or cooked with, each said I looked 55-years of age. Now at 42-years of age that’s a kick in the balls. No, but what’s going to happen when I get to 65? They’ll say, “Oh my god, you look 80!” I suppose what I’m more concerned about is it’s really exciting when you get down to the sort of final six, and when there’s talent like that progressing, and you can witness what they’ve done over an actual period of time and how good they’ve become, it’s real for me. It’s how I know it’s talent and how we are, where we are in terms of our setup. On the possibility of a "Hell's Kitchen"/"Kitchen Nightmares" crossover: Oh dear. I mean every time we go out to do "Kitchen Nightmares" – we just started filming now, and I’m in Queens. And every time I go to the restaurant the chef says, “I want to get better. Can I come onto 'Hell’s Kitchen'?” You know, we had 33,000 applicants this year in terms of "Kitchen Nightmares." So you try your best, but they invite me in. And the sad thing is, you know, they were going to close if I didn’t come anyway. So it’s frustrating, because it’s not difficult if they only could see the woods for the trees. So maybe one day you’ll see a crossover. Definitely. On what other celeb chefs wanting to make it in TV should do: Just keep it real, I suppose. Don’t get overproduced in terms of trying to be someone you’re not going to be. And more importantly, you know, talk from the heart. And with anything to do with TV in terms of, you know, when you are faced with a situation and you’re confronted by cameras, treat them as customers that want to learn from you, as opposed to be lectured by you, and that’s really important. And don’t dribble. You know, cook and talk at the same time is not easy, but at the same time, you know, sure …, and just run through your mind and talk about what you’re doing. Open up and talk and enjoy. And more importantly, relax; don’t worry about trying to edit yourself, and let it go. On the possibility of him replacing Simon Cowell on "American Idol": Stepping in those pair of shoes; right now I’ve got so much going on. It’s pretty amazing, and we’re just really seriously focusing on this new season of "Kitchen Nightmares." And Simon is great. If he’s going to retire, Christ, I would consider stepping in; definitely, of course I would. On the highlights of the past season: For me, when these guys are given a sort of, I suppose the freedom to trade the sort of the individuality, you know, them on a plate. So with a restricted budget and you watch what they can do with, you know, $25 in terms of cooking an entrée. The segment for me is looking at the difference, the significant turnaround from the first time they presented their signature dish to me to what they’ve done a couple months later in terms of when they’ve got their confidence back, when they’re cooking with no agenda, and more importantly, they are spontaneously put on the spot. When you find a chef that can create instantly on his toes, it’s when you think and feel in an everyday real situation across your normal job. And that’s what restaurants are, aren’t they; you know, that little spontaneously creative individuality. And that’s when I get really excited, especially when you get down to the last six. On how the final two this season compare to winners in past seasons: Gosh, I mean honestly, the last two finales of "Hell’s Kitchen," I have to say when I look at who’s in the final tonight and then who’s left, these two individuals, I told them both straight, as far as I’m concerned, the best two we’ve had. But equally good enough to have won any other season hands down individually. In terms of their creativity, two different styles. But more importantly, what you’re going to have for lunch or dinner is sort of the flavor that holds the memory, and so they’re not blown away by pictures; they’re blown away by flavor, content, and creativity. So pretty unique. There’s only one that has the edge, but it’s very, very tough to separate them. On the worst chef ever to be in "Hell's Kitchen": Oh, Jesus. The worst chef ever to have walked into Hell’s Kitchen? God. I mean how can you work with a chef that cries before you even open the place? You know, from a man that comes, you know, from a restaurateur background, with his parents having owned, you know, 80 restaurants across their lives, your instilling confidence before service in terms of a motivational sort of chatter, get together and discussing the menu and fine-tuning things. But then when you turn around and you listen to him bawling his eyes out and we haven’t even opened the doors. That would be don’t become a chef, don’t put yourself on the firing line, become a sort of unique librarian in your neighborhood. On the possibility of having stellar chefs try out in "Hell's Kitchen": Yes. I would love to do that next season in Hell’s Kitchen, with every contestant being a mystery star achiever. So that’s where you would see me. The better the chef, the better you see me in terms of raising my game. So, you know, I call it as I see it; you know, it’s black and white and straight down the line and there’s no weakness in terms of what I give them. So having a dream team of all-star chefs, yeah, definitely. It would be nice to get Mario Batali in there one day, wouldn’t it? On seeing former contestants get a second chance: I would love to see them in a real-life situation, doing one of the "Kitchen Nightmares." Put them all into a restaurant that needs help, and to see what kind of expertise they’ve gained and bought, and to whether they’ve understood the industry and what they’ve picked up and continue to learn with. I’d be interested to dump them into a restaurant that’s struggling and just see how they decide on the way forward with that restaurant. On the pressure Paula and Danny are under: They’re feeling immense pressure. And for me the most exciting finale ever so far in Hell’s Kitchen. I have been to hell and back with these two. And more importantly, on a personal front, it’s very hard to separate them. They are uniquely different; they have total respect for themselves and for their competitors. And more importantly, they have a, I suppose a unique individual style. Danny is talented, young, ambitious, and Paula is a little bit more sedate in terms of she thinks a lot deeper. So yeah, I mean right now they must be absolutely petrified, because it’s the most important service of their entire life. And more importantly, they have to make this one count, because there’s no rehearsal. On how Ramsay would approach the final challenge: A chef is only as good as his team. Whether you’re a quarterback or whether you’re playing baseball or basketball; you’re only as good as your team. So I would ride around, work on all the weaknesses, and then through their strengths. And then make sure everybody is hands-on. No one expediting, and more importantly, everybody seeing off the same page. Crucial. On why Andrea was eliminated: Andrea, in terms of the finishing touches, in terms of, you know, is she a better cook than Paula? Is she a better cook than Danny? No, she’s not. Unfortunately, the competition was so high that it left her slightly exposed. In terms of the balance and the level of finesse, it couldn’t match Danny and it certainly couldn’t match Paula. On Ramsay's diet as he prepares for marathons: In terms of diet, well, it was very hard in terms of what we do, eat and how we taste each and every day. So I’ve cut out dairy, I’ve cut out a lot of wheat things, and more importantly, I suppose the cooking techniques. I’m depending on sort of steamed and sort of and slow-baked. So very little cream, very little butter. And breakfast has turned around; I have a fresh fruit smoothie for breakfast, a light lunch, and then a proper dinner. Not because I’m not eating red meat, but less red meat and more white meat. On Robert, the overweight chef who had to withdraw for health reasons: I was concerned for Robert. Yeah, I mean it’s a great shame. You know, the guy’s got a heart of gold, he is incredibly ambitious, and more importantly, he’s a very talented chef, there’s no two ways about that. But, you know, this is a very pressurized environment, and it only becomes stressful when you can’t handle that pressure. You know, cooking today is far more responsible than ever it was before, because the risk and the roles of a chef today are far greater than ever before. And more importantly, you know, you have to keep yourself fit – it’s a young man’s game – to get through those grueling sort of, you know, chef’s hours, dealing with the pressure. You have to stay fit. And it’s too easy not to look after yourself because you’re tired, fatigued, and you’re struggling to sort of rest. So Robert is an amazing guy. He needs to take time out and get his health in check, and then get himself on a serious diet and start doing a bit of exercise. On the craziest thing Ramsay saw this season: God, when I think of the cast, you know, it’s hard, because there are so many things happening across the day. It’s almost, you know, it’s hard to give you one. But Ben, you know, brought me a dessert before he even sent the entrée. So I’m trying to find out in his mind, where is his mind in terms of getting sight, focus, disciplined, and ready to go. I mean it’s so annoying. Do you know why? Because what kind of dope must you be to stand there, having not sent any appetizer, no entrées, and then to run up with table seven’s dessert before they’ve eaten an appetizer, entrée, is lunacy. - posted by Raoul April 22 Guess that Wasn't Regis's Final AnswerTo celebrate the 10th anniversary of the Regis-hosted game show phenomenon, we will once again have a Philbin-centered "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?"
The show will come back for most of August from Sunday to Thursday.
But is it a show that had its time come and gone? Are the kids these days more interested in seeing "American Idol" and "Wipeout"?
- posted by Raoul April 15 Stop the Reality Madness!Pretty much everyone I know is tired of reality shows (well, except for insert-your-favorites-here). But news about some potential reality shows should cause people to shudder.
Rod Blagojevich is trying to be one of the members of "I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here," if he can get court permission to do it.
Disgraced former NFL QB Michael Vick is trying to get a reality show about his attempt to redeem himself after organizing a series of dog fights.
And the Octomom is going to be filmed by Brits and the product might eventually be aired in the States.
I do have to admit that I will check out at least one episode of "Celebrity" if Blago's on it. But come on, people! Isn't enough enough?
- posted by Raoul April 07 'Top Chef Masters' Reveals Its CastBecause there was apparently mileage to be gotten out of the "Top Chef" name, Bravo has spun it out into "Top Chef Masters." It's a competition that is going to pit some of the familiar guest judges we've seen in the show's five seasons (and other relatively famous names) against each other.
Because Neil Patrick Harris is going to be one of the judges, obviously the series will be legendary.
But I have to say I'm disappointed that Tom Colicchio wouldn't throw his chef's hat into the ring and battle it out with the rest of them. Also, I would have rather had the Top Chef winners all battle it out rather than just appear in one episode together. That way, Hosea could show us that he deserved the title rather than having it simply handed to him when every other finalist melted down.
- posted by Raoul March 27 'DWTS' Curse Claims Another Victim It sure has been a rough season of "Dancing With the Stars" so far. We've had five, that's right five of our celebrity dancers get hurt. Jewel and Nancy O'Dell were both benched pre-season for injuries, and in the three weeks of the competition so far Steve Wozniak has hurt himself twice (foot, hamstring), "Jackass" Steve-O has hurt himself three times (back, back, back) and now...Holly Madison of "The Girls Next Door" has a persistent stitch in her side: "'She hurt herself last week when she was rehearsing the Samba,' Steve Flynn, Madison’s rep, says. '(Thursday) she was practicing the tango and the pain was so bad that it made it basically impossible for her to move.' "ABC camera crews were with Madison at the doctor’s visit. 'While she is not suffering a broken rib, she does continue to feel a great deal of discomfort and was prescribed pain medication,' Flynn says." Ouch! Well, Holly was in the bottom two this week and the injured Steves keep on keepin' on. Maybe her injury will bring her just as much luck. - Posted by Kate |
|
|